On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 07:18:45AM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:16:29PM +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I just don't see this patch going in. I think it needs are larger > > approach to the problems it is trying to solve. I think it then > > will be very useful. > > What problems that it's trying to solve are not addressed?
Unjoined tables. Inconsistent alias references. I think there are a bunch of things and if we can make a list and get a mode to warn about all of them, it would be very useful.
Identification of unjoined tables should be very useful - but it is far to original proposal - so it can be solved separately.
This patch is simple - and usually we prefer more simple patches than one bigger.
