broken formatting? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject broken formatting?
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAzszM_QRV-LLgfYuCNc1tNxo6ozr=5c0bc_eMC-1-Qkw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: broken formatting?
List pgsql-hackers
Hi

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
index a83feea396..12c6548675 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
@@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ numeric_support(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
  * scale of the attribute have to be applied on the value.
  */
 Datum
-numeric        (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
+numeric(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 {
    Numeric     num = PG_GETARG_NUMERIC(0);
    int32       typmod = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);

Regards

Pavel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: CK Tan
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_FREE_IF_COPY extraneous in numeric_cmp?
Next
From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc update for pg_stat_statements normalization