Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAu0R9A1zX7RkS+tronMCw6EL=OOZ5bRJjO6ujRHeuWzw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec
List pgsql-hackers
 

FWIW, I also wish we had something better than format() for this stuff. I did create [1] towards that end, but it currently depends on some C code, which is cumbersome.

For the most party, I'm pretty thrilled with format(), though:
- I'll admit to being grumpy about the %1$s notation, but I have no better suggestion. 
- I'd also like it if there were a %I variant that accepted schema qualified names and %I-ed both, though I see the inability to tell the difference between a schema dot and a really-named-that dot.
- I'd love it if there were a %C format that took a pg_class oid and formatted the qualified schema name. As it is i just use %s and cast the parameter as ::regclass

The design of the "format" function is not closed. Try to send prototype and patch. The possibility to do PostgreSQL customization was strong reason why we didn't implemented "sprintf" and we implemented "format".

Regards

Pavel
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Writing new unit tests with PostgresNode