On 2020-11-29 18:36, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I don't really get the point of this function. There is AFAICT no > function to produce this escaped format, and it's not a recognized > interchange format. So under what circumstances would one need to > use this? > > > Some corporate data can be in CSV format with escaped unicode > characters. Without this function it is not possible to decode these > files without external application.
I would like some supporting documentation on this. So far we only have one stackoverflow question, and then this implementation, and they are not even the same format. My worry is that if there is not precise specification, then people are going to want to add things in the future, and there will be no way to analyze such requests in a principled way.
In some languages (Python), there is decoder "unicode-escape". Java has a method escapeJava, for conversion from unicode to ascii. I can imagine so these data are from Java systems exported to 8bit strings - so this implementation can be accepted as referential. This format is used by https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/tools/unix/native2ascii.html tool too.
Postgres can decode this format too, and the patch is based on Postgres implementation. I just implemented a different interface.
Currently decode function does only text->bytea transformation. Maybe a more generic function "decode_text" and "encode_text" for similar cases can be better (here we need text->text transformation). But it looks like overengineering now.
Maybe we introduce new encoding "ascii" and we can implement new conversions "ascii_to_utf8" and "utf8_to_ascii". It looks like the most clean solution. What do you think about it?
a better name of new encoding can be "unicode-escape" than "ascii". We use "to_ascii" function for different use case.
set client_encoding to unicode-escape;
copy tab from xxx;
...
but it doesn't help when only a few columns from the table are in unicode-escape format.
