On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think that the whole emphasis on whether and to what degree this is >> like Oracle is somewhat misplaced. I would look at it a different >> way. We've talked many times over the years about how PostgreSQL is >> optimized for aborts. Everybody that I've heard comment on that issue >> thinks that is a bad thing. > > > again this depends on usage - when you have a possibility to run VACUUM, > then this strategy is better. > > The fast aborts is one pretty good feature for stable usage. > > Isn't possible to use UNDO log (or something similar) for VACUUM? ROLLBACK > should be fast, but > VACUUM can do more work?
I think that in this design we wouldn't use VACUUM at all. However, if what you are saying is that we should try to make aborts near-instantaneous by pushing UNDO actions into the background, I agree entirely. InnoDB already does that, IIUC.
ok, it can be another process - that can be more aggressive and less limited than vacuum.
