On 2015-08-29 18:27:59 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2015-08-29 18:25 GMT+02:00 Shulgin, Oleksandr <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de> > > Good point. There's still hope to set a flag and process it later on. > > Will have to check if it's possible to stay in the scope of a loaded module > > though.
> I had a workable prototype - and It was implemented very similar as > handling CANCEL
Where did you put the handling of that kind of interrupt? Directly into ProcessInterrupts()?
Probably. I don't remember it well, but it need hack code - it cannot be used from extension.
