Re: proposal: lock_time for pg_stat_database - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 1/16/15 11:35 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:

2015-01-16 18:23 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com <mailto:Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>>:

    On 1/16/15 11:00 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:

        Hi all,

        some time ago, I proposed a lock time measurement related to query. A main issue was a method, how to show this information. Today proposal is little bit simpler, but still useful. We can show a total lock time per database in pg_stat_database statistics. High number can be signal about lock issues.


    Would this not use the existing stats mechanisms? If so, couldn't we do this per table? (I realize that won't handle all cases; we'd still need a "lock_time_other" somewhere).



it can use a current existing stats mechanisms

I afraid so isn't possible to assign waiting time to table - because it depends on order

Huh? Order of what?

    Also, what do you mean by 'lock'? Heavyweight? We already have some visibility there. What I wish we had was some way to know if we're spending a lot of time in a particular non-heavy lock. Actually measuring time probably wouldn't make sense but we might be able to count how often we fail initial acquisition or something.


now, when I am thinking about it, lock_time is not good name - maybe "waiting lock time" (lock time should not be interesting, waiting is interesting) - it can be divided to some more categories - in GoodData we use Heavyweight, pages, and others categories.

So do you see this somehow encompassing locks other than heavyweight locks? Because I think that's the biggest need here. Basically, something akin to TRACE_POSTGRESQL_LWLOCK_WAIT_START() that doesn't depend on dtrace.

--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com