Re: possible proposal plpgsql GET DIAGNOSTICS oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: possible proposal plpgsql GET DIAGNOSTICS oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAL-Cjg8rmnBz-2Lv_SOUJpAJ6Bo6TJ2PcwYwzPuMVu0A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: possible proposal plpgsql GET DIAGNOSTICS oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


út 4. 4. 2023 v 19:34 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> út 4. 4. 2023 v 16:20 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
>> If we do that, then the confusion you were concerned about upthread
>> goes away and we could shorten the keyword back down to "pg_routine_oid",
>> which seems like a good thing for our carpal tunnels.

> has sense

OK, pushed like that with some cosmetic adjustments (better test
case, mostly).

Thank you very much

Regards

Pavel
 

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys