Re: window build doesn't apply PG_CPPFLAGS correctly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: window build doesn't apply PG_CPPFLAGS correctly
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRA5mXbkMJSbguYTVaqSWPc5v232aUt10EvqGFY3KAFVsw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: window build doesn't apply PG_CPPFLAGS correctly  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers


čt 22. 7. 2021 v 20:52 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> napsal:

On 7/22/21 9:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jul-22, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> čt 22. 7. 2021 v 14:04 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
>> napsal:
>>> Almost everything in the Makefiles is not used by the MSVC buid system.
>>> Using this one seems likely to be quite difficult, since the syntax for
>>> the MSVC compiler command line is very different, and furthermore the
>>> MSVC build system doesn't know anything about how to use this setting.
>>>
>>> AFAICT PG_CPPFLAGS is only used by pgxs.
>>>
>>> You would need to tell us more about how your build process is working.
>> I need access to plpgsql.h in build time. This is only one dependency. When
>> I build an extension, then plpgsql.h is in a shared directory. But when I
>> build a module for a test, the header files are not installed yet. For
>> build it requires an include dir -I$(top_srcdir)/src/pl/plpgsql/src
> But Project.pm parses Makefiles and puts stuff into the MSVC buildsystem
> file format; note David Rowley's patch that (among other things) removes
> a bunch of ->AddIncludeDir calls by parsing PG_CPPFLAGS
> https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpXoav0aZnsji-ZNdo=9TXqAwnwmSh44gyn8K7i2PRwJg@mail.gmail.com
> which is probably apropos.
>


Yeah, but that hasn't been applied yet. Pavel should be able to use what
I gave him today, I think.

yes, and it is working

Thank you very much

Pavel



cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: window build doesn't apply PG_CPPFLAGS correctly
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)