Re: PL/pgSQL 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRA14jCW8DTK4r3dYP9L0Cz+gxjE-9fmh9k=VOUVFxLuDg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL 2  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Allowing implicit 'text' -> xml|json|jsonb (was: PL/pgSQL 2)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Craig


2014-09-04 17:54 GMT+02:00 Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 09/04/2014 02:48 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> To take another example, I've been complaining about the fact
> that PostgreSQL 8.3+ requires far more typecasts in stored procedures
> than any other database I'm aware of for years, probably since before
> I joined EnterpriseDB.

+10

This still drives me nuts, and it's a serious problem for ORM users too.

The idea that we won't accept a 'text' typed input for an 'xml' or
'json' field is IMO absurdly and needlessly pedantic. I've not yet seen
an argument for what problems this solves.

I know why the changes in 8.3 were made, and they're clearly beneficial
overall, but we need to start putting some more implicit casts from text
to text-like types in, especially where there's no SQL-standard type
that users of JDBC etc can easily use in mappings.

I don't see a problem in additional casts.

But some missing casts are well - I found lot performance issues based on using wrong data types - integers, dates in text column.

Pavel
 

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Join push-down support for foreign tables
Next
From: Atri Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: Join push-down support for foreign tables