On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 12:39 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
> I’ve skimmed through the patch set. Here are some minor notes.
Thanks for the review
>
> 1. Cycles “for (slotno = bankstart; slotno < bankend; slotno++)” in SlruSelectLRUPage() and
SimpleLruReadPage_ReadOnly()now have identical comments. I think a little of copy-paste is OK.
> But SimpleLruReadPage_ReadOnly() does pgstat_count_slru_page_hit(), while SlruSelectLRUPage() does not. This is not
relatedto the patch set, just a code nearby.
Do you mean to say we need to modify the comments or you are saying
pgstat_count_slru_page_hit() is missing in SlruSelectLRUPage(), if it
is later then I can see the caller of SlruSelectLRUPage() is calling
pgstat_count_slru_page_hit() and the SlruRecentlyUsed().
> 2. Do we really want these functions doing all the same?
> extern bool check_multixact_offsets_buffers(int *newval, void **extra,GucSource source);
> extern bool check_multixact_members_buffers(int *newval, void **extra,GucSource source);
> extern bool check_subtrans_buffers(int *newval, void **extra,GucSource source);
> extern bool check_notify_buffers(int *newval, void **extra, GucSource source);
> extern bool check_serial_buffers(int *newval, void **extra, GucSource source);
> extern bool check_xact_buffers(int *newval, void **extra, GucSource source);
> extern bool check_commit_ts_buffers(int *newval, void **extra,GucSource source);
I tried duplicating these by doing all the work inside the
check_slru_buffers() function. But I think it is hard to make them a
single function because there is no option to pass an SLRU name in the
GUC check hook and IMHO in the check hook we need to print the GUC
name, any suggestions on how we can avoid having so many functions?
> 3. The name SimpleLruGetSLRUBankLock() contains meaning of SLRU twice. I’d suggest truncating prefix of infix.
>
> I do not have hard opinion on any of this items.
>
I prefer SimpleLruGetBankLock() so that it is consistent with other
external functions starting with "SimpleLruGet", are you fine with
this name?
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
