Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-vkzpDMysNvmDC0gvnH3ppmmnTTkACj6x9ovW=3XCG4Ow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:34 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Note: With this testing, we have found a bug in the bank-wise
> approach, basically we are clearing a procglobal->clogGroupFirst, even
> before acquiring the bank lock that means in most of the cases there
> will be a single process in each group as a group leader

I realized that the bug fix I have done is not proper, so will send
the updated patch set with the proper fix soon.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL: Incomplete item Allow handling of %TYPE arrays, e.g. tab.col%TYPE[]