On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, SH_TYPE's members SH_ELEMENT_TYPE *data and void *private_data
> are not going to work in DSM, because they are pointers. You can
> doubtless come up with a way around that problem, but I guess the
> question is whether that's actually any better than just using DHT.
Probably I misunderstood the question. I assumed that we need to bring
in DHT only for achieving this goal. But, if the question is simply
the comparison of DHT vs simplehash for this particular case then I
agree that DHT is a more appropriate choice.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
