On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:32 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:28:43PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> >
> >> ...
> >
> >I have worked on this patch, so as discussed now I am maintaining the
> >preserved compression methods using dependency. Still PRESERVE ALL
> >syntax is not supported, I will work on that part.
> >
>
> Cool, I'll take a look. What's your opinion on doing it this way? Do you
> think it's cleaner / more elegant, or is it something contrary to what
> the dependencies are meant to do?
I think this looks much cleaner. Moreover, I feel that once we start
supporting the custom compression methods then we anyway have to
maintain the dependency so using that for finding the preserved
compression method is good option.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
