Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Date
Msg-id 20201012140238.lb3hoxfwvmmmlaix@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:28:43PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
>> ...
>
>I have worked on this patch, so as discussed now I am maintaining the
>preserved compression methods using dependency.  Still PRESERVE ALL
>syntax is not supported, I will work on that part.
>

Cool, I'll take a look. What's your opinion on doing it this way? Do you
think it's cleaner / more elegant, or is it something contrary to what
the dependencies are meant to do?


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?