Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-upJnVNRiFo28n_3BE3kuowz7emR+MGBDGOH3TD=A1Kww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
List pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
Probably want to run for at least 5 minutes via -T 300

Last time i run for 5 minutes and taken median of three runs, just missed mentioning "-T 300" in the mail..

By looking at the results with scale factor 1000 and 100 i don't see any reason why it will regress with scale factor 300.

So I will run the test again with scale factor 300 and this time i am planning to run 2 cases.
1. when data fits in shared buffer
2. when data doesn't fit in shared buffer.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes