Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-uYu3Aw+keuag3oUD788pCY7VMDzxQuOXiveF4yU84MDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:20 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 4:34 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have modified 0001 and 0002 slightly,  Basically, instead of two
> > function CheckAndSetLockHeld and CheckAndReSetLockHeld, I have created
> > a one function.
> >
>
> +CheckAndSetLockHeld(LOCALLOCK *locallock, bool value)
>
> Can we rename the parameter as lock_held, acquired or something like
> that so that it indicates what it intends to do and probably add a
> comment for that variable atop of function?

Done

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray