On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 3:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:57 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 3:04 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Why we need memory-related to subxacts till the worker is alive? As
> > > we have now, after reading subxact info (subxact_info_read), we need
> > > to ensure that it is freed after its usage due to which we need to
> > > remember and perform pfree at various places.
> > >
> > > I think we should once see the possibility that such that we could
> > > switch to this new context in start stream message and reset it in
> > > stop stream message. That might help in avoiding
> > > MemoryContextSwitchTo TopMemoryContext at various places.
> >
> > Ok, I understand, I think subxacts can be allocated in new
> > LogicalStreamingContext which we can reset at the stream stop. How
> > about xids?
> >
>
> How about storing xids in ApplyContext? We do store similar lifespan
> things in that context, for ex. see store_flush_position.
That sounds good to me, I will make this change in the next patch
set, along with other changes.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
