Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Subject | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-uGw7tio=6e9RPGuOjGcHB7i4vgfxKy-z=isS-hV6b0dw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:01 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 4:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:23 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 6:59 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know what you think of the changes? > > > > > > > > I have reviewed the changes and looks fine to me. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, I am planning to start committing a few of the infrastructure > > > patches (especially first two) by early next week as we have resolved > > > all the open issues and done an extensive review of the entire > > > patch-set. In the attached version, there is a slight change in one > > > of the commit messages as compared to the previous version. I would > > > like to describe in brief the first two patches for the sake of > > > convenience. Let me know if you or anyone else sees any problems with > > > these. > > > > > > The first patch in the series allows us to WAL-log subtransaction and > > > top-level XID association. The logical decoding infrastructure needs > > > to know which top-level > > > transaction the subxact belongs to, in order to decode all the > > > changes. Until now that might be delayed until commit, due to the > > > caching (GPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS), preventing features requiring > > > incremental decoding. So we also write the assignment info into WAL > > > immediately, as part of the next WAL record (to minimize overhead) > > > only when *wal_level=logical*. We can not remove the existing > > > XLOG_XACT_ASSIGNMENT WAL as that is required for avoiding overflow in > > > the hot standby snapshot. > > > > > Pushed, this patch. > > > > > > > > The patch set required to rebase after committing the binary format > > option support in the create subscription command. I have rebased the > > patch set on the latest head and also added a test case to test > > streaming in binary format. > > > > While going through commit 9de77b5453, I noticed below change: > > @@ -424,6 +424,10 @@ libpqrcv_startstreaming(WalReceiverConn *conn, > PQfreemem(pubnames_literal); > pfree(pubnames_str); > > + if (options->proto.logical.binary && > + PQserverVersion(conn->streamConn) >= 140000) > + appendStringInfoString(&cmd, ", binary 'true'"); > + > > Now, the similar change in this patch series is as below: > > @@ -408,6 +408,9 @@ libpqrcv_startstreaming(WalReceiverConn *conn, > appendStringInfo(&cmd, "proto_version '%u'", > options->proto.logical.proto_version); > > + if (options->proto.logical.streaming) > + appendStringInfo(&cmd, ", streaming 'on'"); > + > > I think we also need a version check similar to commit 9de77b5453 to > ensure that we send the new option only when connected to a newer > version (>=14) primary server. I have changed that in the attached patch. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment
pgsql-hackers by date: