Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-tFm3Ecp=LiNQSQv0j7VR22UBb5tQNa+iUUqTggi4_sEA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:25 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/16/21 03:52, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:01 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> >> Rather than use size, I'd be inclined to say use this if the source
> >> database is marked as a template, and use the copydir approach for
> >> anything that isn't.
> > Yeah, that is possible, on the other thought wouldn't it be good to
> > provide control to the user by providing two different commands, e.g.
> > COPY DATABASE for the existing method (copydir) and CREATE DATABASE
> > for the new method (fully wal logged)?
> >
>
>
> This proposal seems to have gotten lost.

Yeah, I am planning to work on this part so that we can support both methods.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints