Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id 674498d7-e6a8-f39f-f1ef-d15863eaccbd@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/9/22 10:58, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:25 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/16/21 03:52, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:01 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>>> Rather than use size, I'd be inclined to say use this if the source
>>>> database is marked as a template, and use the copydir approach for
>>>> anything that isn't.
>>> Yeah, that is possible, on the other thought wouldn't it be good to
>>> provide control to the user by providing two different commands, e.g.
>>> COPY DATABASE for the existing method (copydir) and CREATE DATABASE
>>> for the new method (fully wal logged)?
>>>
>>
>> This proposal seems to have gotten lost.
> Yeah, I am planning to work on this part so that we can support both methods.
>

OK, many thanks.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Database-level collation version tracking
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints