Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id c5404c65-2638-34e0-4a61-cd27505ef64a@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/16/21 03:52, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:01 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> Rather than use size, I'd be inclined to say use this if the source
>> database is marked as a template, and use the copydir approach for
>> anything that isn't.
> Yeah, that is possible, on the other thought wouldn't it be good to
> provide control to the user by providing two different commands, e.g.
> COPY DATABASE for the existing method (copydir) and CREATE DATABASE
> for the new method (fully wal logged)?
>


This proposal seems to have gotten lost.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve function toast_delete_external (src/backend/access/table/toast_helper.c)
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints