On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:20 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Meanwhile, here's a rebased set of patches. The somewhat-primitive
> attempts at writing tests are in 0009, but they don't work, for the
> reasons explained above. I think I'd probably like to go ahead and
> commit 0001 and 0002 soon if there are no objections, since I think
> those are good refactorings independently of the rest of this.
>
I have started reading the patch today, I haven't yet completed one
pass but here are my comments in 0007
1.
+ BlockNumber relative_block_numbers[RELSEG_SIZE];
This is close to 400kB of memory, so I think it is better we palloc it
instead of keeping it in the stack.
2.
/*
* Try to parse the directory name as an unsigned integer.
*
- * Tablespace directories should be positive integers that can
- * be represented in 32 bits, with no leading zeroes or trailing
+ * Tablespace directories should be positive integers that can be
+ * represented in 32 bits, with no leading zeroes or trailing
* garbage. If we come across a name that doesn't meet those
* criteria, skip it.
Unrelated code refactoring hunk
3.
+typedef struct
+{
+ const char *filename;
+ pg_checksum_context *checksum_ctx;
+ bbsink *sink;
+ size_t bytes_sent;
+} FileChunkContext;
This structure is not used anywhere.
4.
+ * If the file is to be set incrementally, then num_incremental_blocks
+ * should be the number of blocks to be sent, and incremental_blocks
/If the file is to be set incrementally/If the file is to be sent incrementally
5.
- while (bytes_done < statbuf->st_size)
+ while (1)
{
- size_t remaining = statbuf->st_size - bytes_done;
+ /*
I do not really like this change, because after removing this you have
put 2 independent checks for sending the full file[1] and sending it
incrementally[1]. Actually for sending incrementally
'statbuf->st_size' is computed from the 'num_incremental_blocks'
itself so why don't we keep this breaking condition in the while loop
itself? So that we can avoid these two separate conditions.
[1]
+ /*
+ * If we've read the required number of bytes, then it's time to
+ * stop.
+ */
+ if (bytes_done >= statbuf->st_size)
+ break;
[2]
+ /*
+ * If we've read all the blocks, then it's time to stop.
+ */
+ if (ibindex >= num_incremental_blocks)
+ break;
6.
+typedef struct
+{
+ TimeLineID tli;
+ XLogRecPtr start_lsn;
+ XLogRecPtr end_lsn;
+} backup_wal_range;
+
+typedef struct
+{
+ uint32 status;
+ const char *path;
+ size_t size;
+} backup_file_entry;
Better we add some comments for these structures.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
