Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-sb8NEj+QSZF7TqySBhJww-a6HkC4YPtGCgQB3WYcT4Cg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:38 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:12 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the tests. The latest patch looks mostly good to me. I have
> > > made minor changes to the patch (a) changed the order where the new
> > > message is placed at one place to make it consistent with other
> > > places, (b) as discussed offlist, removed the extra increment to a
> > > local variable in ReorderBufferRestoreChange, (c) ran pgindent.
> > >
> > > See the attached and let me know what do you think?
> >
> > The changes look good to me.
> >
>
> Pushed!

Thanks!

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Possible memory leak in pgcrypto with EVP_MD_CTX
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Use appendStringInfoString and appendPQExpBufferStr where possible