On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:23 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:20 PM Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:10 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, you are right. I will change it in the next version, along with
> > > the test case.
> > >
> > + /*
> > + * if the key hasn't changed and we're only logging the key, we're done.
> > + * But if tuple has external data then we might have to detoast the key.
> > + */
> > This doesn't really mention why we need to detoast the key even when
> > the key remains the same. I guess we can add some more details here.
>
> Noted, let's see what others have to say about fixing this, then I
> will fix this along with one other pending comment and I will also add
> the test case. Thanks for looking into this.
I have fixed all the pending issues, I see there is already a test
case for this so I have changed the output for that.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com