On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 7:33 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 2:09 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can we instead try to use other suitable existing error codes?
>
> Why?
>
> I mean, I'm not 100% against using existing error codes, but I feel
> like we might be distorting the meanings of the existing error codes.
> If we used new error codes, then people could test for those and know
> that they would get exactly these conditions and nothing else.
>
To enhance the clarity and specificity of our error reporting,
particularly for logical replication conflicts, I suggest we consider
defining a dedicated class of error codes, much like we have for FDWs.
IMHO this would be a more future-proof approach, given the potential
for many new conflict detection types in the future.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google
