Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-sCY=PqB8OR_a0NNQSDy0F0J8Yae+JjywkaV7DS67cYJw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 5:45 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 11:31, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:23:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Hmmm ... I'd tend to do SELECT COUNT(*) FROM.  But can't we provide
> > > any actual checks on the sanity of the output?  I realize that the
> > > output's far from static, but still ...
> >
> > Honestly, checking all the fields is not that exciting, but the
> > maximum I can think of that would be portable enough is something like
> > the attached.  No arithmetic operators for xid limits things a bit,
> > but at least that's something.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> The patch does not apply on top of HEAD as in [1], please post a rebased patch:
>

Because of the extra WAL overhead, we are not continuing with the
patch, I will withdraw it.



-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: A new strategy for pull-up correlated ANY_SUBLINK