Hi,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 06:28, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Alexander, it seems to me that we should also consider lock_timeout
> and idle_in_transaction_session_timeout (new as of 9.6), no? We could
Well, I was thinking about it and came to the conclusion that we are
neither taking heavy locks nor explicitly opening a transaction and
therefore we can avoid changing them.
But maybe you are right, having them set to the safe value shouldn't hurt.
> also group the PQexec/PQresultStatus into a simple wrapper which gets
> also called by run_simple_query().
I don't think we can use the same wrapper for run_simple_query() and
for places where we call a SET, because PQresultStatus() returns
PGRES_TUPLES_OK and PGRES_COMMAND_OK respectively.
Passing expected ExecStatusType to the wrapper for comparison is
looking a bit ugly to me.
Regards,
--
Alexander Kukushkin
