Re: Separate volumes - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Erik Brandsberg
Subject Re: Separate volumes
Date
Msg-id CAFcck8FF4T3_PL7Fa+iW5YBkA4iZ3aR2V_jka=GpV9taPph9NQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Separate volumes  (Ed Behn <ed.behn@collins.com>)
Responses Re: Separate volumes  (Steve Midgley <science@misuse.org>)
List pgsql-sql
With SSD and it's random IO performance, I doubt that this advice would apply as much, and adds complexity to your configuration and management.  In particular if you use any filesystem level snapshotting (like with ZFS), splitting the filespaces will make it harder to do restores and using snapshots.

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Ed Behn <ed.behn@collins.com> wrote:
I was once told that it's best practice to store tables and indexes in separate tablespaces located on separate physical drives. It seemed logical that this should improve performance because the read-head wouldn't need to jump back and forth between a table and its index. 

However, I can't seem to find this advice anywhere online. Is it indeed best practice? Is it worth the hassle?

          -Ed

Ed Behn | Senior Systems Engineer | Avionics

COLLINS ÆROSPACE

2551 Riva Road, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA

Tel: +1 410 266 4426 | Mobile: +1 240 696 7443

ed.behn@collins.com | collinsaerospace.com

CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message may contain proprietary and/or privileged information of Collins Aerospace and its affiliated companies. If you are not the intended recipient, please 1) Do not disclose, copy, distribute or use this message or its contents. 2) Advise the sender by return email. 3) Delete all copies (including all attachments) from your computer. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.



--
Erik Brandsberg
erik@heimdalldata.com

www.heimdalldata.com
+1 (866) 433-2824 x 700
AWS Competency Program

pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Ed Behn
Date:
Subject: Separate volumes
Next
From: Steve Midgley
Date:
Subject: Re: Separate volumes