On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 3:05 AM Michael Paquier <
michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> After review, I don't like much the idea of allowing concurrent
> autovacuums to run in parallel of the table(s) of this test, so we'd
> better disable it explicitely.
Make sense.
> "t1" is also a very generic name to use in a regression test.
Agreed!
> Another thing that itched me is that we
> could also test more with indexes, particularly with btree, BRIN and
> hash (the latter should not have a FSM with 10 pages as per the first
> group batch, and each one has a stable an initial state).
What about GIN/GIST indexes?
> I have extended the set of tests as of the attached, running these
> across everything I could (CI, all my hosts including Windows, macos,
> Linux). We could do more later, of course, but this looks enough to
> me as a first step. And I think that this will not upset the
> buildfarm.
Also LGTM.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
