> I know this has been discussed and rejected before, but I find that > rejection to be wrong-headed. I have repeatedly been asked, with > levels of exasperation ranging from mild to homicidal, why we don't > have this feature, and I have no good answer. If it were somehow > difficult to record this or likely to produce a lot of overhead, that > would be one thing. But it isn't. It's probably a hundred-line > patch, and AFAICS the overhead would be miniscule.
Hi all,
The attached patch add a new column into 'pg_database' called 'datcreated' to store the timestamp of database creation.
If this feature is approved I could extend it to add a column into 'pg_class' to store creation timestamp too.
I think we can discuss about psql support to show this new info about databases...
