Re: Temporary table has become problematically persistent - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ricky Ramirez
Subject Re: Temporary table has become problematically persistent
Date
Msg-id CAFbL3Bqr=_hhFW0z7oOLmLZ4g-nHYB=pg8jmwipBPoCd_GYWkw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Temporary table has become problematically persistent  (Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net>)
List pgsql-general
We couldn't drop the table in the normal setup because of the wraparound protection measures. Specifically: "ERROR:  database is not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss in database"

We also tried vacuuming the table. The vacuum didn't generate an error (the wraparound warning was printed), but nothing appeared to change from that. Vacuuming the full database would have taken prohibitively long so we never completed that operation.

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 6:17 PM Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net> wrote:
Ricky Ramirez <ricky@reddit.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> We have run into a strange situation with our database. A temporary
> table was created some time ago and that session has since died.
> However, the temporary table stuck around. It's been around long
> enough that postgres stopped accepting writes to prevent
> transaction ID wraparound. Problem is, it's a temporary table and the
> session that it's associated with is gone, so we cannot vacuum it nor
> even drop the table. We even restarted postgres and the temporary
> table was still there!

What happened when you tried to drop the temp table?

>
> The table shows up in pg_class as a temporary table with zero tuples.
> The table replicated over to other hosts. We were able to promote a
> replica and then single user mode the replica and drop the offending
> table. I still have the original broken database available for
> debugging. Can I provide any additional debugging information?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ricky
>
>

--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres.consulting@comcast.net

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong PostgreSQL Plan
Next
From: Virendra Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong PostgreSQL Plan