Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ajin Cherian
Subject Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAFPTHDbSmNWmh0CJXZZ=hEDY2iAmsoc55apCQ9b197_P2EnpDA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
List pgsql-hackers



On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:

1.
I felt that this protocol documentation needs to include something
like a "Since: 2" notation (e.g. see how the javadoc API [1] does it)
otherwise with more message types and more protocol versions it is
quickly going to become too complicated to know what message or
message attribute belongs with what protocol.


Updated.
 
2.
There are inconsistent terms used for a transaction id.
e.g.1 Sometimes called " Transaction id."
e.g.2 Sometimes called "Xid of the transaction"
I think there should be consistent terminology used on this page

Updated.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we remove extra memset in BloomInitPage, GinInitPage and SpGistInitPage when we have it in PageInit?