Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ajin Cherian
Subject Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date
Msg-id CAFPTHDay+Y-HFzCK84WeZXuPa62mZ8jqhz7bH+GhXGCbaweH5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:38 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

> Okay, attached an updated patch with only that change.

I ran Erik's test suite [1] on this patch overnight and found no
errors. No more comments from me. The patch looks good.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

[1]- https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/93d02794068482f96d31b002e0eb248d%40xs4all.nl



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Nancarrow
Date:
Subject: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: pg13.2: invalid memory alloc request size NNNN