Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ajin Cherian
Subject Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date
Msg-id CAFPTHDah36V4nO5psZmwgNmujZ_wq-iut--D7ZfadNqgpqn6=w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 2:46 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks, I have pushed the patch but getting one failure:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=thorntail&dt=2021-02-12%2002%3A28%3A12
>
> The reason seems to be that we are trying to connect and
> max_wal_senders is set to zero. I think we can write this without
> trying to connect. The attached patch fixes the problem for me. What
> do you think?

Verified this with installcheck and modified configuration to have
wal_level = minimal and max_wal_senders = 0.
Tests passed. The changes look good  to me.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yugo NAGATA
Date:
Subject: Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)