Re: COPY with hints, rebirth - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: COPY with hints, rebirth
Date
Msg-id CAFNqd5Xffz2DxBDcpqY=Ok7=L2v46TOpi_nhtRHjhwr0rajoGQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: COPY with hints, rebirth  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: COPY with hints, rebirth  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> But it is very effective at avoiding 4 out of the 5 writes you mention.

For the "common case," would we not want to have (1) [WAL] and (2)
[Writing the pre-frozen tuple]?

If we only write the tuple (2), and don't capture WAL, then the COPY
wouldn't be replicable, right?
-- 
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work
Next
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: LIST OWNED BY...