On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> "nondeletable" is surely terrible, since they may well have got into
> this state by being deleted. "nonremovable" is better, but still not
> great.
Bit of brain storm, including looking over to terminology used for
garbage collection:
- stillreferenceable
- notyetremovable
- referenceable
- reachable
Perhaps those suggest some option that is a bit less horrible? I
think I like referenceable best, of those.
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
