On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> The problem I've found with most tools is that they work reasonably
> well if you let them control the entire workflow. But when you want to
> do things your own way, and it doesn't match up with what they were
> originally designed to do, it all comes falling down quickly...
That's pretty much characteristic of the average SAP R/3 project.
If you can change the organization's business processes to follow
SAP's defined "best practices," then it's easy to install and use R/3.But that normally not being the case, every "SAP
project"winds up
having hideous customization costs to kludge the practices towards one
another.
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
