<p dir="ltr">It's broadly interesting, but since it bakes in a build dependency on CMake, there is some risk that the
dependenciesbecome an insurmountable problem.<p dir="ltr">(Does CMake run on a VAX 11/780?? :-))<p dir="ltr">It is
probablyworth a try, to see what improvements arise, albeit with the need to accept some risk of refusal of the
change.<pdir="ltr">The experiment is most likely necessary: we won't know the benefits without trying.<p dir="ltr">If
theresults represent little improvement, there will be little or no appetite to jump through the dependency hoops
neededto get the change accepted.<p dir="ltr">On the other hand, if there are big gains, that encourages pushing thru
thedependency issues.<div class="gmail_quote">On Aug 28, 2015 10:45, "YUriy Zhuravlev" <<a
href="mailto:u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru">u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru</a>>wrote:<br type="attribution" /><blockquote
class="gmail_quote"style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello Hackers<br /><br /> How
wouldyou react if I provided a patch which introduces a CMake build<br /> system?<br /><br /> Old thread:<br /><a
href="http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/200812291325.13354.peter_e@gmx.net"rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/200812291325.13354.peter_e@gmx.net</a><br/><br /> The main
argumentagainst the "it's too hard". I'm right?<br /><br /> Thanks!<br /> --<br /> YUriy Zhuravlev<br /> Postgres
Professional:<a href="http://www.postgrespro.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.postgrespro.com</a><br />
TheRussian Postgres Company<br /><br /><br /> --<br /> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (<a
href="mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</a>)<br/> To make changes to your
subscription:<br/><a href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers</a><br/></blockquote></div>
