Re: WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id CAFNqd5V-LWwWCfa_o1nxJB=jDMQTrAp51Z9c-dhBLsLjCFvb+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to WIP: About CMake v2  (YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Re: WIP: About CMake v2
List pgsql-hackers

It's broadly interesting, but since it bakes in a build dependency on CMake, there is some risk that the dependencies become an insurmountable problem.

(Does CMake run on a VAX 11/780??  :-))

It is probably worth a try, to see what improvements arise, albeit with the need to accept some risk of refusal of the change.

The experiment is most likely necessary: we won't know the benefits without trying.

If the results represent little improvement, there will be little or no appetite to jump through the dependency hoops needed to get the change accepted.

On the other hand, if there are big gains, that encourages pushing thru the dependency issues.

On Aug 28, 2015 10:45, "YUriy Zhuravlev" <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
Hello Hackers

How would you react if I provided a patch which introduces a CMake build
system?

Old thread:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/200812291325.13354.peter_e@gmx.net

The main argument against the "it's too hard". I'm right?

Thanks!
--
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2