Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Date
Msg-id CAFNqd5Ui+=3YcM=WWBsPDjy0Q0FFwy87q9BPrT2fcaJBS3s0cg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There's value in having an "immutability" constraint on a column,
>> where, in effect, you're not allowed to modify the value of the
>> column, once assigned.
>
> +1  We would definitely use such a feature, should it become
> available.

Added to TODO list.
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: psql concise mode