Re: FDW API / flow charts for the docs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: FDW API / flow charts for the docs?
Date
Msg-id CAFNqd5Ub_2dwgBm4r9kZYadG=rau1rRo2hbbdeX7vx_zpr4CGw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FDW API / flow charts for the docs?  (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>)
Responses Re: FDW API / flow charts for the docs?  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr">I would be more inclined to let GraphViz into the process than Dia; the former fits *much* better into a
Make-basedprocess.<p dir="ltr">It is worth observing that there are schema diagramming systems (SchemaSpy is mighty
likable)that build diagrams using GraphViz.  We have integrated this into internal deployments at Afilias.<p
dir="ltr">RodTaylor's autodoc tool has some minimal Dia support, but it lacks the ability to do layout; if you use Dia
output,you'll have to manually drag things around to have the tables *not* all atop one another.  I'm a little
surprisedDia hasn't integrated in GraphViz to help with that; note that the MacOS diagram tool OmniGraffle
(proprietary,considered quite good, competitive with Visio) uses GraphViz to help do automatic object layout.  That
thisis integrated inside an interactive GUI app is pretty wild/cool.<p dir="ltr">I'd think it a fine idea to add rules
for.dot files (the usual GraphViz language/format to describe graphs) to the PG Make rules. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple psql -c / -f options
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: libpgport vs libpgcommon