Hi,
Le ven. 7 juin 2024 à 06:18, Julien Tachoires <julmon@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Le ven. 7 juin 2024 à 05:59, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> a écrit :
> >
> > On 6/6/24 12:58, Julien Tachoires wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > When compiled with LZ4 support (--with-lz4), this patch enables data
> > > compression/decompression of these temporary files. Each transaction
> > > change that must be written on disk (ReorderBufferDiskChange) is now
> > > compressed and encapsulated in a new structure.
> > >
> >
> > I'm a bit confused, but why tie this to having lz4? Why shouldn't this
> > be supported even for pglz, or whatever algorithms we add in the future?
>
> That's right, reworking this patch in that sense.
Please find a new version of this patch adding support for LZ4, pglz
and ZSTD. It introduces the new GUC logical_decoding_spill_compression
which is used to set the compression method. In order to stay aligned
with the other server side GUCs related to compression methods
(wal_compression, default_toast_compression), the compression level is
not exposed to users.
The last patch of this set is still in WIP, it adds the machinery
required for setting the compression methods as a subscription option:
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... WITH (spill_compression = ...);
I think there is a major problem with this approach: the logical
decoding context is tied to one replication slot, but multiple
subscriptions can use the same replication slot. How should this work
if 2 subscriptions want to use the same replication slot but different
compression methods?
At this point, compression is only available for the changes spilled
on disk. It is still not clear to me if the compression of data
transiting through the streaming protocol should be addressed by this
patch set or by another one. Thought ?
Regards,
JT
