About the stability of COPY BINARY data - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dominique Devienne
Subject About the stability of COPY BINARY data
Date
Msg-id CAFCRh-9W8mXh9MfRe-Z5bAcN5FVbsXuSW60-QPVMB1jHC4+bzQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: About the stability of COPY BINARY data
Re: About the stability of COPY BINARY data
List pgsql-general
From https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-copy.html:
|> binary-format file is less portable across machine architectures
and PostgreSQL versions

In my experience, the binary encoding of binding/resultset/copy is
endian neutral (network byte order), so what is the less portable
across machine architectures that warning about?

Also, does the code for per-type _send() and _recv() functions really change
across versions of PostgreSQL? How common are instances of such
changes across versions? Any examples of such backward-incompatible
changes, in the past?

The binary data contains OIDs, but if sticking to built-in types,
which OIDs are unlikely to change across versions?

I'm obviously storing COPY BINARY data (we have lots of bytea
columns), and I wonder how bad it is long term, and across PostgreSQL
versions.

Thanks for any insights, --DD



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Why not do distinct before SetOp
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Issue with Hash Partition Query Execution in PostgreSQL 16