On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:14 PM Raphael Salguero Aragón
<raphael.salguero@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Am 23.09.2024 um 17:37 schrieb Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>:
> > I'd be glad to use Pavel's proposed %N. —DD
> I just wanted to add that we are also supporting a larger customer with exactly the same request.
> Perhaps this increases the value of the adjustment a little more :)
Hi. Thanks for sharing Raphael. That's a 3rd notch Tom! :)
So is it the proverbial "third time's a charm" and the community would
revise its initial rejection?
I keep making that point, but the fact this is entirely opt-in,
mitigates the "expensive" argument IMHO.
FWIW. Thank you for considering this RFC again, especially since
there's a patch for it. Respectfully, --DD