Custom GUCs and typos - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
Subject Custom GUCs and typos
Date
Msg-id CAFC+b6p6ekLFfTLvTaPQsk7Zwj_WrtuJYzDQK0h-HvREZCFX+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Custom GUCs and typos
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,
while going through this thread [0] i have some different views and questions on this problem so creating a separate thread,this is just an attempt, i might be brutally wrong here.

1) On top of OP's patch I added support to warn if the prefix of custom GUC is invalid,for valid questions such as "How do you know that's a bogus prefix?  It could perfectly well be a fully valid setting for an extension that the installation doesn't choose to preload.",we can get the info of such extensions using extension_file_exists() which tells that its installed but not preloaded thanks to Greg for proposing this,which tells this could be a potential valid extension ,so if its not it in reserved_class_prefix and also not in prefix/share/extension dir then the prefix is for sure invalid,so i warn and remove the GUC from hashtable.

2) for preloaded extensions if the suffix/parameter is a typo or if we want to create a new custom GUC for ex:"pg_stat_statements.count_something = 1", currently we throwing a warning as

WARNING:  invalid configuration parameter name "pg_stat_statements.count_something", removing it 
"pg_stat_statements" is now a reserved prefix.

I guess this means you cant create a new custom GUC manually ,you have to use "DefineCustomXXXVariable" routines,but this kind of warning is not there for non-preloaded extensions ,so i added the same for non-preloaded ones ,once again checking the extension_file_exists() if the extension was  built/installed this could make it a potential valid extension so it warns as 

if i try add this "plpgsql.ironman = 3000"

WARNING:  invalid configuration parameter name "plpgsql.ironman", removing it
DETAIL:  "plpgsql.ironman" has a valid prefix.

3) I also added all the above support for the SET command also which previously was not there.
4) TODO: add support for ALTER SYSTEM SET ,if this patch makes sense.

thoughts?


[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/196f3f8e12f.87666a6c16169.9160742057750715009%40zohocorp.com
--
Thanks,
Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in polling loop code path in XactLockTableWait