Re: cutting down the TODO list thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsGXZvu9pdcpKUXD49ThPSzqX5S-vJJfUbD4JeG2S+L-eg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cutting down the TODO list thread  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: cutting down the TODO list thread  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:57 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2020-10-28 16:20:03 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I would personally prefer a completely seprate page

Same.

Ok, that's two votes for a separate page, and one for a new section on the same page, so it looks like it's a new page. That being the case, I would think it logical to move "features we don't want" there. As for the name, we should probably encompass both "won't fix" bugs and features not wanted. Maybe "past development ideas" or "not worth doing", but I'm open to better ideas. Once that's agreed upon, I'll make a new page and migrate the items over, minus the two that were mentioned upthread.

--
John Naylor
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum worker doesn't immediately exit on postmaster death
Next
From: Georgios Kokolatos
Date:
Subject: Re: Consistent error reporting for encryption/decryption in pgcrypto