Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | John Naylor |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAFBsxsFz=GqaG5Ens5aNgVYoV2Y+pfMUijX0ku+CCkWfALwiqg@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Responses |
Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 6:08 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> I had another read-through and test-through of this version, and have applied
> it with some minor changes to comments and whitespace. Thanks for the quick
> turnaround times on reviews in this thread!
- VacuumFailsafeActive = false;
+ Assert(!VacuumFailsafeActive);
I can trigger this assert added in commit 7d71d3dd08.
First build with the patch in [1], then:
session 1:
CREATE EXTENSION xid_wraparound ;
CREATE TABLE autovacuum_disabled(id serial primary key, data text) WITH (autovacuum_enabled=false);
INSERT INTO autovacuum_disabled(data) SELECT generate_series(1,1000);
-- I can trigger without this, but just make sure it doesn't get vacuumed
BEGIN;
DELETE FROM autovacuum_disabled WHERE id % 2 = 0;
session 2:
-- get to failsafe limit
SELECT consume_xids(1*1000*1000*1000);
INSERT INTO autovacuum_disabled(data) SELECT 1;
SELECT consume_xids(1*1000*1000*1000);
INSERT INTO autovacuum_disabled(data) SELECT 1;
VACUUM autovacuum_disabled;
WARNING: cutoff for removing and freezing tuples is far in the past
HINT: Close open transactions soon to avoid wraparound problems.
You might also need to commit or roll back old prepared transactions, or drop stale replication slots.
WARNING: bypassing nonessential maintenance of table "john.public.autovacuum_disabled" as a failsafe after 0 index scans
DETAIL: The table's relfrozenxid or relminmxid is too far in the past.
HINT: Consider increasing configuration parameter "maintenance_work_mem" or "autovacuum_work_mem".
You might also need to consider other ways for VACUUM to keep up with the allocation of transaction IDs.
server closed the connection unexpectedly
#0 0x00007ff31f68ebec in __pthread_kill_implementation ()
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007ff31f63e956 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007ff31f6287f4 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x0000000000978032 in ExceptionalCondition (
conditionName=conditionName@entry=0xa4e970 "!VacuumFailsafeActive",
fileName=fileName@entry=0xa4da38 "../src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c", lineNumber=lineNumber@entry=392) at ../src/backend/utils/error/assert.c:66
#4 0x000000000058c598 in heap_vacuum_rel (rel=0x7ff31d8a97d0,
params=<optimized out>, bstrategy=<optimized out>)
at ../src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c:392
#5 0x000000000069af1f in table_relation_vacuum (bstrategy=0x14ddca8,
params=0x7ffec28585f0, rel=0x7ff31d8a97d0)
at ../src/include/access/tableam.h:1705
#6 vacuum_rel (relid=relid@entry=16402, relation=relation@entry=0x0,
params=params@entry=0x7ffec28585f0, skip_privs=skip_privs@entry=true,
bstrategy=bstrategy@entry=0x14ddca8)
at ../src/backend/commands/vacuum.c:2202
#7 0x000000000069b0e4 in vacuum_rel (relid=16398, relation=<optimized out>,
params=params@entry=0x7ffec2858850, skip_privs=skip_privs@entry=false,
bstrategy=bstrategy@entry=0x14ddca8)
at ../src/backend/commands/vacuum.c:2236
#8 0x000000000069c594 in vacuum (relations=0x14dde38,
params=0x7ffec2858850, bstrategy=0x14ddca8, vac_context=0x14ddb90,
isTopLevel=<optimized out>) at ../src/backend/commands/vacuum.c:623
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoAyYBZOiB1UPCPZJHTLk0-arrq5zqNGj%2BPrsbpdUy%3Dg-g%40mail.gmail.com
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
pgsql-hackers by date: