Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsFXCdLa9ubttm7=UXPVECZq9=JbD+cgq4Qn39NYfvbGpA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 1:18 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> [stuff about size classes]

I kind of buried the lede here on one thing: If we only have 4 kinds regardless of the number of size classes, we can use 2 bits of the pointer for dispatch, which would only require 4-byte alignment. That should make that technique more portable.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"
Next
From: Polina Bungina
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall