Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsFD+M4u4ZXnSQAWhp3cXYGWEA7o6kaPW_qi9e=Xi5NcBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:12 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:

> > FWIW, docs need to hold to a higher standard than code comments.
>
> Thanks. In general, I agree that the docs and error/log messages
> (user-facing) need to be of higher standard, but at the same time code
> comments too IMHO. Because many hackers/developers consider code
> comments a great place to learn the internals, being consistent there
> does no harm.

git log and git blame are more useful when they are free of minor
stylistic changes. Of course, corrections and clarity are different
matters that are worth fixing in the comments. I've pushed the doc
fixes, thanks for the patch!


--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Time to increase hash_mem_multiplier default?
Next
From: walther@technowledgy.de
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add reloption for views to enable RLS