Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsE_+tJrRdo6scCZ6UjC2bpPKnMN+djOBO0G3WPuyTzZ0A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 6:53 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:34 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > BTW cfbot reported that some regression tests failed due to OOM. I've
> > attached the patch to fix it.
>
> Seems worth doing now rather than later, so added this and squashed most of the rest together.

This segfaults because of a mistake fixing a rebase conflict, so v40 attached.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.